Abstract

Hobbes’ theory of the state is based on natural principles, i.e. everybody’s search for security and peace. The eternally valid rules of peaceful coexistence between men - the natural laws - are even binding on the sovereign, Hobbes maintains. I intend to show that, though there is no doubt in Hobbes’ assertion of natural law, the definition of civil law, i.e. the sovereign’s will, is not affected by this fact. Hobbes’ belief, that the sovereign - carrying out his task to guarantee peace - will in most cases respect the laws of nature, although he can in no way be obliged to do so in terms of civil law, is said to be unconvincing. I argue, that it can be explained with regard to the sovereign’s situation, which, unlike the naturale state, is one of complete security. This means that war as a result of the endless search for more power is, in Hobbes’ view, unnecessary for an absolute monarch.