On Human Conduct is composed of three connected essays. Each has its own concern: the first with theoretical understanding, and with human conduct in general; the second with an ideal mode of human relationship which the author has called civil association; and the third with that ambiguous, historic association commonly called a modern European state. Running through the work is Professor Oakshott's belief in philosophical reflection as an adventure: the adventure of one who seeks to understand in other terms what (...) he already understands, and where the understanding is sought is a disclosure of the conditions of the understanding enjoyed and not a substitute for it. Its most appropriate expression is an essay, which, he writes, 'does not dissemble the conditionality of the conclusions it throws up and although it may enlighten it does not instruct.'. (shrink)

"Rationalism in Politics, " first published in 1962, has established the late Michael Oakeshott as the leading conservative political theorist in modern Britain. This expanded collection of essays astutely points out the limits of "reason" in rationalist politics.Oakeshott criticizes ideological schemes to reform society according to supposedly "scientific" or rationalistic principles that ignore the wealth and variety of human experience. "Rationalism in politics," says Oakeshott, "involves a misconception with regard to the nature of human knowledge." History has shown that it (...) produces unexpected, often disastrous results. "Having cut himself off from the traditional knowledge of his society, and denied the value of any education more extensive than a training in a technique of analysis," the Rationalist succeeds only in undermining the institutions that hold civilized society together. In this regard, rationalism in politics is "a corruption of the mind."Timothy Fuller is Professor of Political Science and Dean of the College at Colorado College. (shrink)

This classic work is here published for the first time in paperback in recognition of its enduring importance. Its theme is Modality: human experience recognized as a variety of independent, self-consistent worlds of discourse, each the invention of human intelligence, but each also to be understood as abstract and an arrest in human experience. The theme is pursued in a consideration of the practical, the historical and the scientific modes of understanding.

Introduction to Leviathan.--The moral life in the writings of Thomas Hobbes.--Dr. Leo Strauss on Hobbes.--Leviathan: a myth.

'The religious man will inherit nothing he cannot possess by actual insight... in place of an ideal of steady acquisition for some ulterior end in which, perhaps, he can never share, he will follow one which values it solely by its worth to present insight. And he will maintain a kind of candid detachment in the face of the very highest actual achievement.' -from 'Religion and the World'.

Yale University Press is continuing to make available the best of these illuminating works.

THE HISTORY OF POLITICAL THOUGHT Every man's reading of past events comes to acquire, in the course of time, a certain conceptual structure. It is not a structure he merely invents and imposes upon the course of events, but one which he ...

This is a collection of 30 pieces by Michael Oakeshott, almost all of which are previously unpublished, covering every decade of his intellectual career. The essays were intended mostly for lectures or seminars and retain an informal style that makes them accessible to readers.

When it first appeared in 1933, Experience and its Modes was not considered a classic. But as philosophical fashion moved away from the analytic philosophy of the 1930s, this work began to seem ahead of its time. Arguing that experience is 'modal', in the sense that we always have a theoretical or practical perspective on the world, Michael Oakeshott explores the nature of philosophical experience and its relationship to three of the most important 'modes' of non-philosophical experience - science, history (...) and practice - seeking to establish the autonomy and superiority of philosophy. In recognition of its enduring importance, this book is presented in a fresh series livery for a new generation of readers, featuring a specially commissioned preface written by Paul Franco. (shrink)

Thomas Hobbes est le seul penseur de la tradition philosophique à qui le philosophe britannique Michael Oakeshott consacra entièrement l’un de ses livres, un recueil d’essais et de conférences qu’il publia en 1975 sous le titre de Hobbes on Civil Association. À quoi tient l’importance décisive reconnue ainsi à l’œuvre de Hobbes, et quel rôle particulier joua la pensée de Hobbes dans l’élaboration de la pensée de Oakeshott lui-même? Le titre donné au recueil donne une indication précieuse. Tant d’un point (...) de vue philosophique que d’un point de vue historique, Oakeshott a en effet thématisé à travers le concept d’« association civile » un mode d’association politique précis des hommes, celui dans lequel les individus sont liés par le respect de certaines règles et de certaines pratiques, mais non par une fin commune unique. C’est dans cette perspective que Oakeshott a pu opposer la nomocratie d’une societas à la téléocratie d’une universitas, c’est-à-dire d’un État qui se donnerait comme mission d’imposer un même objectif à tous ses membres. La lecture que fait Oakeshott de Hobbes est ainsi très clairement une lecture « libérale » : il comprend Hobbes comme un penseur du cadre formel d’une societas, et non pas d’une universitas, c’est-à-dire comme un penseur, précisément, de l’« association civile ». Afin de permettre l’évaluation d’une telle lecture, la traduction de l’ouvrage de Oakeshott, la première en langue française, est accompagnée de la traduction de cinq autres essais que l’auteur a consacrés à Hobbes entre 1935 et 1974. (shrink)

Michael Oakeshott a contribué de manière décisive à la recherche sur Hobbes, sur l’historiographie et sur la pensée politique dans le monde moderne et contemporain. « Rationalism in Politics », que l’on trouvera ici dans la traduction d’Olivier Sedeyn, est l’un des textes les plus représentatifs de sa pensée et, cela vaut la peine d’être ajouté, de son style...

This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and (...) made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant. (shrink)

Michael Oakeshott a contribué de manière décisive à la recherche sur Hobbes, sur l’historiographie et sur la pensée politique dans le monde moderne et contemporain. « Rationalism in Politics » , que l’on trouvera ici dans la traduction d’Olivier Sedeyn, est l’un des textes les plus représentatifs de sa pensée et, cela vaut la peine d’être ajouté, de son style..

The original lecture was delivered by the author in the Ateneo of Madrid, as part of the series called 'Tendencias actuales del pensamiento europeo' , on 20th April 1955.