Intertextual analysis today

Sign Systems Studies 30 (2):645-651 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Mikhail L. Gasparov. Intertextual analysis today. The paper provides a discussion about recent results and perspectives of intertextual analysis — the method that has been a contemporary with Tartu-Moscow school. The connections between the classical philological methods and intertextual analysis are described, together with specifying the concept of intertext and emphasizing the need for the correctness of a researcher, because such an analysis always carries a danger of overinterpretation. Several examples are used to illustrate how the imagination of a researcher can create arbitrary allusions that are not based on the original text and are usually misleading. As a result, the text under study will not become more clear, vice versa, it turns to be less understandable.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The intersemiotic space.Peeter Torop - 2000 - Sign Systems Studies 28:116-133.
Semiotics of mediation.Peeter Torop - 2012 - Sign Systems Studies 40 (3/4):547-555.
Crete in the Aeneid: Two Intertextual Footnotes.Stephanie West - 2003 - Classical Quarterly 53 (1):302-308.
Sulpicia and Her Fama: An Intertextual Approach to Recovering Her Latin Literary Image.Judith P. Hallett - 2006 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 100 (1):37-42.
Jacob vs. The Married Harlot: Intertextual Foils in the Guide of the Perplexed.James Diamond - 2001 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 10 (1):1-25.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-04

Downloads
31 (#514,567)

6 months
6 (#514,728)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references