Volitions, Préoccupations Prudentielles, Et Réflexivité Dans la Psychopathie

Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 17 (1-2):4–30 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In accordance with a tradition depicting individuals with psychopathic functioning as morally blind, or even morally dead, discussions concerning their moral agency have for a long time neglected the analysis of volitional and conative aspects, whose contribution is nevertheless crucial in our understanding of their immoral actions. Based on the findings about the discrepancy that seems to occur, in this type of personality, between moral judgments and moral choices, we propose in this article to discuss the several theories that might explain this gap between what the psychopath recognizes (or can, in a general way, recognizes) and what he does. After having presented the hypothesis - problematic in more than one sense - of a weakness of will associating psychopathy with acrasia, we expose the respective contributions of rationalist and neo-sentimentalist conceptions, before questioning the presupposition they share with theories of psychopathic incontinence. We argue that each of these three positions implicitly tends, with little empirical support, to ascribe to these dyssocial individuals a propensity to resort to some form of deliberative activity. An in-depth discussion of the prudential characteristics of psychopathy will lead us, on the contrary, to defend the idea that the immorality of those who suffer from it is, in most cases, only a collateral effect of a lack of appetite for the process of reflective self-evaluation. And we will see that there are strong reasons to believe that this lack of reflection - which accounts for many facets of the psychopathy construct while remaining compatible with the main explanatory models now favored to understand the psychopath’s moral decisions - is directly related to the (extremely poor) emotional life of psychopaths. We conclude by arguing that this way of linking emotional deficit and reflective impairment offers new perspectives for thinking about the different types of moral profiles found within the various forms of psychopathy that we suggest to distribute along a continuum on which levels of experiential deficiency extend.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Malebranche and the General Will of God.Eric Stencil - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (6):1107-1129.
Malebranche on Laws of Nature and God’s General Volitions.Alan Baker - 2004 - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis 7.
Occasionalism, Laws and General Will.Russell Wahl - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19 (2):219-240.
Rational Action: Reasons, Causes, and Choices.David Redmond - 2010 - Dissertation, University of Missouri, St. Louis
Le Figuier Et Le Coudrier: Allégorie Et Réflexivité Dans Le Microcosme.François Rigolot - 1987 - Bibliothèque d'Humanisme Et Renaissance 49 (1):7-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-03-09

Downloads
17 (#852,234)

6 months
14 (#171,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations