Response deadline and subjective awareness in recognition memory - volume 8, number 4 (1999), pages 484-496

Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):327-327 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On pages 490-491, in describing the results of Experiment 2, the authors state that out of a total of 3840 responses, only 355 (or 9%) fell outside the response deadlines. In fact, the total number of responses in Experiment 2 was 3200 and so the 355 responses represented 11%, not 9%, of the total. This error has no other implications. The authors are grateful to Peter Graf (personal communication, March 12, 2000) for pointing out the error.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Comments on “Truth in Reconciliation”.Alphonso Lingis - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):337-338.
Response.Robert King - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):99-99.
Response.Tony Wild - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):101-102.
Response.Mark Woodrow - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):311-312.
Response.Frank Brennan - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):217-218.
Response.Christopher James Ryan - 2011 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (1):103-104.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
14 (#995,492)

6 months
1 (#1,478,456)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references