Order:
Disambiguations
Cristina Ramponi [6]C. Ramponi [2]
  1.  32
    Experiences of Remembering, Knowing, and Guessing.John M. Gardiner, Cristina Ramponi & Alan Richardson-Klavehn - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (1):1-26.
    This article presents and discusses transcripts of some 270 explanations subjects provided subsequently for recognition memory decisions that had been associated with remember, know, or guess responses at the time the recognition decisions were made. Only transcripts for remember responses included reports of recollective experiences, which seemed mostly to reflect either effortful elaborative encoding or involuntary reminding at study, especially in relation to the self. Transcripts for know responses included claims of just knowing, and of feelings of familiarity. These transcripts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  2.  12
    Limitations of the Signal Detection Model of the Remember-Know Paradigm: A Reply to Hirshman.John M. Gardiner, Alan Richardson-Klavehn & Cristina Ramponi - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7 (2):285-288.
  3.  5
    Conceptual Implicit Memory in Subclinical Depression.Cristina Ramponi, Jeremy S. Nayagam & Philip J. Barnard - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (3):551-568.
  4. A Hardcastle, Valerie Gray, 173 Pauen, Michael, 202 Peters, Madelon L., 27 Heywood, CA, 410 Azzopardi, Paul, 292 Hirshman, Elliot, 103 Hobson, J. Allan, 67 R B. [REVIEW]Valerie Huemer, Cristina Ramponi, Talis Bachmann, G. Keith Humphrey, Antti Revonsuo, Marlene Behrmann, Raffaella Ricci, Neil Binder, Edoardo Bisiach & Marc Jeannerod - 1998 - Consciousness and Cognition 7:647.
  5.  15
    Reducing Specificity of Autobiographical Memory in Nonclinical Participants: The Role of Rumination and Schematic Models.Edward R. Watkins, Cristina Ramponi & Philip J. Barnard - 2006 - Cognition and Emotion 20 (3-4):328-350.
  6.  12
    Response Deadline and Subjective Awareness in Recognition Memory - Volume 8, Number 4 (1999), Pages 484-496.J. M. Gardiner, C. Ramponi & A. Richardson-Klavehn - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):327-327.
    On pages 490-491, in describing the results of Experiment 2, the authors state that out of a total of 3840 responses, only 355 (or 9%) fell outside the response deadlines. In fact, the total number of responses in Experiment 2 was 3200 and so the 355 responses represented 11%, not 9%, of the total. This error has no other implications. The authors are grateful to Peter Graf (personal communication, March 12, 2000) for pointing out the error.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7.  18
    Response Deadline and Subjective Awareness in Recognition Memory.J. M. Gardiner, C. Ramponi & A. Richardson-Klavehn - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (4):484-496.
    Level of processing and generation effects were replicated in separate experiments in which recognition memory was tested using either short (500 ms) or long (1500 ms) response deadlines. These effects were similar at each deadline. Moreover, at each deadline these effects were associated with subsequent reports of remembering, not of knowing. And reports of both knowing and remembering increased following the longer deadline. These results imply that knowing does not index an automatic familiarity process, as conceived in some dual-process models (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  8.  3
    Response Deadline and Subjective Awareness in Recognition Memory.John M. Gardiner, Cristina Ramponi & Alan Richardson-Klavehn - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8 (4):484-496.
    Level of processing and generation effects were replicated in separate experiments in which recognition memory was tested using either short or long response deadlines. These effects were similar at each deadline. Moreover, at each deadline these effects were associated with subsequent reports of remembering, not of knowing. And reports of both knowing and remembering increased following the longer deadline. These results imply that knowing does not index an automatic familiarity process, as conceived in some dual-process models of recognition, and that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark