7 found
  1.  32
    When all is revealed: A dissociation between evaluative learning and contingency awareness.Eamon P. Fulcher & Marianne Hammerl - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):524-549.
    Three experiments are reported that address the issue of awareness in evaluative learning in two different sensory modalities: visual and haptic. Attempts were made to manipulate the degree of awareness through a reduction technique (by use of a distractor task in Experiments 1 and 2 and by subliminally presenting affective stimuli in Experiment 3) and an induction technique (by unveiling the evaluative learning effect and requiring participants to try to discount the influence of the affective stimuli). The results indicate overall (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2.  11
    Reactance in affective‐evaluative learning: Outside of conscious control?Eamon P. Fulcher & Marianne Hammerl - 2005 - Cognition and Emotion 19 (2):197-216.
    Recent studies have shown that the basic evaluative conditioning (EC) effect (originally neutral stimuli acquiring an affective value congruent with the valence of the affective stimulus they were paired with) seems to be limited to participants who are unaware of the stimulus pairings. If participants are aware of the pairings, reactance effects occur (i.e., changes in the opposite direction of the valence of the affective stimulus). To examine whether these reactance effects are due to processes of conscious countercontrol or whether (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  3.  34
    I like it, but only when I’m not sure why: Evaluative conditioning and the awareness issue.Marianne Hammerl - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (1):37-40.
  4.  44
    When all is considered: Evaluative learning does not require contingency awareness.Eamon P. Fulcher & Marianne Hammerl - 2001 - Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):567-573.
    We argue that the effects of evaluative learning may occur (a) without conscious perception of the affective stimuli, (b) without awareness of the stimulus contingencies, and (c) without any awareness that learning has occurred at all. Whether the three experiments reported in our target article provide conclusive evidence for either or any of these assertions is discussed in the commentaries of De Houwer and Field. We respond with the argument that when considered alongside other studies carried out over the past (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5. Kai Vogeley, Martin Kurthen, Peter Falkai, and Wolfgang Maier. Essential Functions of the Human.Elkhonon Goldberg, Kenneth Podell, J. Proust, Karl H. Pribram, Vittorio Gallese, Marianne Hammerl, Andy P. Field, Frederick Travis, R. Keith Wallace & J. Allan Cheyne - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8:270.
    Export citation  
  6. John P. Kline, Gary E. Schwartz, Ziya V. Dikman, and Iris R. Bell. Electroencephalographic Regis.Marianne Hammerl, Andy P. Field, Benjamin Libet, Peter Cariani & Steven Ravett Brown - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8:585.
    Export citation  
  7. John M. Gardiner, Cristina Ramponi, and Alan Richardson-Klavehn. Response Deadline and Sub.Nancy J. Woolf, Marianne Hammerl, Andy P. Field, Ron Sun, Santosh A. Helekar & Benjamin Libet - 1999 - Consciousness and Cognition 8:390.