Hein van den Berg. Kant on Proper Science: Biology in the Critical Philosophy and the Opus postumum. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015. Pp. 283. $129.00 ; $99.00 [Book Review]

Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (2):364-367 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Kant's conception of proper science.Hein Berg - 2011 - Synthese 183 (1):7-26.
Chemistry in Kant’s Opus Postumum.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2016 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 6 (1):64-95.
The Wolffian roots of Kant’s teleology.Hein van den Berg - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):724-734.
Kant's Opus Postumum and McDowell's Critique of Kant.Martin Shuster - 2014 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 52 (4):427-444.
Wolff and Kant on Scientific Demonstration and Mechanical Explanation.Hein van den Berg - 2013 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95 (2):178-205.
Kant's final synthesis: an essay on the Opus postumum.Eckart Förster - 2000 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
María de Paz and Robert DiSalle, eds. Poincaré, Philosopher of Science. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014. Pp. xiv+191. $179.00. [REVIEW]Marij van Strien - 2015 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 5 (1):183-187.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
34 (#471,489)

6 months
7 (#435,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references