More undecidable lattices of Steinitz exchange systems

Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (2):859-878 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that the first order theory of the lattice $\mathscr{L}^{ (S) of finite dimensional closed subsets of any nontrivial infinite dimensional Steinitz Exhange System S has logical complexity at least that of first order number theory and that the first order theory of the lattice L(S ∞ ) of computably enumerable closed subsets of any nontrivial infinite dimensional computable Steinitz Exchange System S ∞ has logical complexity exactly that of first order number theory. Thus, for example, the lattice of finite dimensional subspaces of a standard copy of $\bigoplus_\omega$ Q interprets first order arithmetic and is therefore as complicated as possible. In particular, our results show that the first order theories of the lattice L(V ∞ ) of c.e. subspaces of a fully effective ℵ 0 -dimensional vector space V∞ and the lattice of c.e. algebraically closed subfields of a fully effective algebraically closed field F ∞ of countably infinite transcendence degree each have logical complexity that of first order number theory

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,990

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
34 (#458,799)

6 months
13 (#276,402)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Computably enumerable sets and quasi-reducibility.R. Downey, G. LaForte & A. Nies - 1998 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 95 (1-3):1-35.
Automorphisms of substructure lattices in recursive algebra.David R. Guichard - 1983 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 25 (1):47-58.
Recursively enumerable vector spaces.G. Metakides - 1977 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 11 (2):147.
Intersections of algebraically closed fields.C. J. Ash & John W. Rosenthal - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30 (2):103-119.

View all 12 references / Add more references