Should Biological Evidence or DNA Be Retained by Forensic Science Laboratories after Profiling? No, except under Narrow Legislatively-Stipulated Conditions

Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):375-379 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

DNA profiling and databasing have become commonplace in criminal investigation and prosecution. There is a body of both state and federal legislation enabling the establishment and operation of profile databases for law enforcement purposes. Most legislation is specific as to who may be profiled for inclusion in a database. The majority of state laws permit DNA profile databasing of offenders convicted of certain defined crimes, of missing persons and their relatives, and of DNA profiles from criminal-case evidence where the depositor is unknown. More recently, a few states have acted to permit databasing profiles of suspects of certain types of crimes, and there appears to be a trend toward wider adoption of this practice. The legislation adopted or proposed thus far defines whose DNA profiles can be databased, and under what circumstances. Less attention has been given to the matter of specimen retention following profiling and databasing.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,932

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Families and Forensic DNA Profiles.Rebecca Dresser - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (3):11-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-02-04

Downloads
12 (#1,093,652)

6 months
2 (#1,446,987)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references