Self-help for learned journals: Scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s

History of Science 60 (2):255-279 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the decades after the Second World War, learned society publishers struggled to cope with the expanding output of scientific research and the increased involvement of commercial publishers in the business of publishing research journals. Could learned society journals survive economically in the postwar world, against this competition? Or was the emergence of a sales-based commercial model of publishing – in contrast to the traditional model of subsidized journal publishing – an opportunity to transform the often-fragile finances of learned societies? But there was also an existential threat: if commercial firms could successfully publish scientific journals, were learned society publishers no longer needed? This paper investigates how British learned society publishers adjusted to the new economic realities of the postwar world, through an investigation of the activities organized by the Royal Society of London and the Nuffield Foundation, culminating in the 1963 report Self-Help for Learned Journals. It reveals the postwar decades as the time when scientific research became something to be commodified and sold to libraries, rather than circulated as part of a scholarly mission. It will be essential reading for all those campaigning to transition academic publishing – including learned society publishing – away from the sales-based model once again.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Miscellaneous methods: authors, societies and journals in early modern England.Adrian Johns - 2000 - British Journal for the History of Science 33 (2):159-186.
Editorial Board Self-Publishing Rates in Czech Economic Journals.Radek Zdeněk - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (2):669-682.
The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics.Stefan Eriksson & Gert Helgesson - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):163-170.
Optimal Publishing Strategies.Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2009 - Episteme 6 (2):185-199.
Communication scientifique : pour le meilleur et le PEER.Laurent Romary - 2010 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 57 (2):131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-03-19

Downloads
6 (#1,451,665)

6 months
4 (#783,550)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references