Fragments of Kripke–Platek set theory and the metamathematics of $$\alpha $$ α -recursion theory

Archive for Mathematical Logic 55 (7-8):899-924 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The foundation scheme in set theory asserts that every nonempty class has an ∈\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\in $$\end{document}-minimal element. In this paper, we investigate the logical strength of the foundation principle in basic set theory and α\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha $$\end{document}-recursion theory. We take KP set theory without foundation as the base theory. We show that KP-\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$^-$$\end{document} + Π1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\Pi _1$$\end{document}-Foundation + V=L\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$V=L$$\end{document} is enough to carry out finite injury arguments in α\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha $$\end{document}-recursion theory, proving both the Friedberg-Muchnik theorem and the Sacks splitting theorem in this theory. In addition, we compare the strengths of some fragments of KP.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recursion theory for metamathematics.Raymond Merrill Smullyan - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Kripke-Platek Set Theory and the Anti-Foundation Axiom.Michael Rathjen - 2001 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):435-440.
A Note on Recursive Models of Set Theories.Domenico Zambella & Antonella Mancini - 2001 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 42 (2):109-115.
Foundation versus Induction in Kripke-Platek Set Theory.Domenico Zambella - 1998 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (4):1399-1403.
Operational closure and stability.Gerhard Jäger - 2013 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 164 (7-8):813-821.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-11-06

Downloads
14 (#985,107)

6 months
6 (#507,808)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

On the relative strengths of fragments of collection.Zachiri McKenzie - 2019 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 65 (1):80-94.
Initial self-embeddings of models of set theory.Ali Enayat & Zachiri Mckenzie - 2021 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 86 (4):1584-1611.
End extending models of set theory via power admissible covers.Zachiri McKenzie & Ali Enayat - 2022 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 173 (8):103132.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Admissible Sets and Structures.Jon Barwise - 1978 - Studia Logica 37 (3):297-299.
The α-finite injury method.G. E. Sacks & S. G. Simpson - 1972 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 4 (4):343-367.
On Interpretations of Arithmetic and Set Theory.Richard Kaye & Tin Lok Wong - 2007 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 48 (4):497-510.
Finite injury and Σ1-induction.Michael Mytilinaios - 1989 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):38 - 49.

View all 17 references / Add more references