Abstract Creationism and Authorial Intention

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2):129-137 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract creationism about fictional characters is the view that fictional characters are abstract objects that authors create. I defend this view against criticisms from Stuart Brock that hitherto have not been adequately countered. The discussion sheds light on how the number of fictional characters depends on authorial intention. I conclude also that we should change how we think intentions are connected to artifacts more generally, both abstract and concrete.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-04-26

Downloads
488 (#41,343)

6 months
107 (#49,446)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Friedell
Union College

Citations of this work

Artifacts and mind-dependence.Tim Juvshik - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):9313-9336.
Fictional Creationism and Negative Existentials.Jeonggyu Lee - forthcoming - Canadian Journal of Philosophy:1-16.
Authorship and Creation.Nurbay Irmak - 2021 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 79 (2):175-185.
Artifactualization without Physical Modification.Tim Juvshik - 2021 - Res Philosophica 98 (4):545-572.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

On Denoting.Bertrand Russell - 1905 - Mind 14 (56):479-493.
Fiction and Metaphysics.Amie L. Thomasson - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reference and Existence: The John Locke Lectures.Saul A. Kripke - 2013 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonexistent Objects.Terence Parsons - 1980 - Yale University Press.

View all 43 references / Add more references