Neurogenetic determinism is a theological doctrine

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):893-894 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Lifelines” Steven Rose constructs a case against neurogenetic determinism based on experimental data from biology and in favor of a significant degree of self determination. Two philosophical errors in the case favoring neurogenetic determinism are illustrated by Rose: category mistakes and an excessively narrow view of causality restricted to the linear form.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Précis of lifelines: Biology, freedom, determinism.Steven Rose - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):871-885.
Theological determinism and the problem of evil.Neal Judisch - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (2):165-184.
Biological determinism lives and needs refutation despite denials.Steven Rose - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):912-918.
Lifelines to a sinking cause.H. Dieter Steklis - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):907-909.
Determinism, Free Will, and Moral Responsibility.Gerald Dworkin (ed.) - 1970 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Behavioral neurogenetics beyond determinism.Wim E. Crusio - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):890-891.
Determinism and Free Will in Alexander of Aphrodisias and the Arabic Tradition.Luis Xavier López-Farjeat - 2007 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 81:161-177.
Selection and “freedom” in biology and psychology.Julian C. Leslie - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):897-897.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
71 (#226,531)

6 months
3 (#992,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references