Neurogenetic determinism is a theological doctrine

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):893-894 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In “Lifelines” Steven Rose constructs a case against neurogenetic determinism based on experimental data from biology and in favor of a significant degree of self determination. Two philosophical errors in the case favoring neurogenetic determinism are illustrated by Rose: category mistakes and an excessively narrow view of causality restricted to the linear form.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,745

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Selection and “freedom” in biology and psychology.Julian C. Leslie - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):897-897.
Lifelines to a sinking cause.H. Dieter Steklis - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):907-909.
Homology, neurogenetic imprecision, and lesional complexity.Ralph-Axel Müller - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (3):573-574.
Biological determinism versus the concept of a person.Robert Miller - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):901-902.
The Neurogenetic Substructures of Human Consciousness.John K. Grandy - 2014 - Essays in Philosophy 15 (2):266-278.
The science of life as seen through rose-coloured glasses.Mike Anderson - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):886-887.
Determinism, omniscience, and the multiplicity of explanations.Mary Midgley - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):900-901.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
73 (#78,785)

6 months
5 (#1,552,255)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references