Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):158-174 (2012)
AbstractFormal guarantees of political equality are compatible with inequalities in the value of political liberties, as individuals may convert their socioeconomic advantages into political advantages. Perhaps the predominant strategy for limiting substantive political inequalities recommends limiting inequalities in the means of acquiring political power for private gain – most notably, economic means. I express a worry that measures instituted to restrict economic inequalities may do more to frustrate the cause of political equality than to further it. I argue that attempts to decrease individuals' means to capture political power will systematically increase their motives to capture political power
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Rawls and Bleeding Heart Libertarianism: How Well Do They Mix?Nicolas Maloberti - 2015 - The Independent Review 19 (4).
Similar books and articles
Political Inequality and the 'Super-Rich': Their Money or (Some of) Their Political Rights.Dean J. Machin - 2013 - Res Publica 19 (2):121-139.
The Coherence of Rawls's Plea for Democratic Equality.Percy B. Lehning - 1998 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (4):1-41.
Rawls and the Status of Political Liberty.Steven Wall - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (2):245–270.
Political Liberalism, Basic Liberties, and Legal Paternalism.William Glod - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (2):177-196.
The Power of Scientific Knowledge: From Research to Public Policy.Reiner Grundmann - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
A Modified Rawlsian Theory of Social Justice: “Justice as Fair Rights”.Rodney G. Peffer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:593-608.
'A Liberal Defence of Compulsory Voting': Some Reasons for Scepticism.Annabelle Lever - 2008 - POLITICS 28 (1):61-64.