Confusion about the Right to Life

The Reasoner 5 (1):4-5 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend the consistency of affirming the right to life while rejecting universal healthcare and liveable income programmes. I also defend the rationality of accepting inconsistency.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scarcity and Saving Lives.Danny Frederick - 2011 - The Reasoner 5 (6):89-90.
On an inconsistency in Thomson's abortion argument.Roger F. Gibson - 1984 - Philosophical Studies 46 (1):131 - 139.
No Exception, a Pro-life Imperative.Charles E. Rice - 1990 - Human Life International.
Abortion and Assent.Rosamond Rhodes - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):416-427.
An Irrelevant Consideration: Killing Versus Letting Die (2nd edition).Michael Tooley - 1994 - In Bonnie Steinbock & Alastair Norcross (eds.), Killing and letting die. New York: Fordham University Press. pp. 103–111.
Thomson's Violinist and Conjoined Twins.Kenneth Einar Himma - 1999 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (4):428-435.
To live is to die: A virtue account of arguments for the right to die.Franlu Vulliermet - 2020 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 10 (1-2):20-29.
The right to live, the right to die.Charles Everett Koop - 1976 - Wheaton, Ill.: Tyndale House Publishers.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-11

Downloads
647 (#28,047)

6 months
14 (#254,662)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references