We’re Only in It for the Money : The Financial Structure of STEM and STEAM Research

In Paul Smeyers & Marc Depaepe (eds.), Educational Research: Ethics, Social Justice, and Funding Dynamics. Springer Verlag. pp. 261-274 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The development of the philosophy of science in the twentieth century has created a framework where issues concerning funding dynamics can be easily accommodated. It combines the historical-philosophical approach of Thomas Kuhn. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, [1962] ) with the sociological approach of Robert K. Merton The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 267–278, [1942] ), linking the ‘exact’ sciences to economy and politics. Out of this came a new domain, namely the study of scientific practices : Science as practice and culture. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992). Given this broad theoretical framework, we will specify by looking at the case of STEM education and its variant Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics with Art education as an example par excellence. Without going into the technical details of the financial support of the projects, we prefer to open a philosophical debate on the way how policies on academic subjects influence a whole society and the personal life of both researchers and people/pupils involved in education.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,628

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
14 (#985,107)

6 months
4 (#775,606)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references