Uncertainty about Determinism: A Critical Review of Challenges to the Determinism of Modern Science

Behavior and Philosophy 22 (2):71 - 83 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Contemporary scientific determinism is a grand induction from scientific experience. Limitations on measurement of the kind represented by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle have thrown doubt on deterministic philosophy. But the case against determinism does not stand examination. Scientific support for deterministic philosophy continues to be justified.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,752

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Determinism, laws, and predictability in principle.Richard Boyd - 1972 - Philosophy of Science 39 (4):431-450.
Determinism, Randomness, and Value.Noa Latham - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1-2):153-167.
Foresight and knowledge.Yves René Marie Simon - 1996 - New York: Fordham University Press. Edited by R. C. Nelson & Anthony O. Simon.
Microdeterminism and concepts of emergence.Robert L. Klee - 1984 - Philosophy of Science 51 (March):44-63.
Biological determinism versus the concept of a person.Robert Miller - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):901-902.
Early Stoic Determinism.Susanne Bobzien - 2005 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 4 (4):489-516.
How free are you? The determinism problem.Ted Honderich - 2001 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 249.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
38 (#417,943)

6 months
3 (#965,065)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references