Why Lawyers Derail Justice [Book Review]

Review of Metaphysics 55 (2):376-378 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In an excellent work on the American legal system, John C. Anderson holds modern legal theory as largely to blame for the gross injustices that he claims commonly occur. Anderson begins by listing a number of examples of legal injustices and then spends the rest of the book explaining why misguided legal theory is to blame. His critique begins with the most representative and influential of twentieth-century legal theorists, Ronald Dworkin, then moves back to Kant, whom he holds to be the intellectual forefather of the errors of modern legal theory. The fourth chapter attempts to rehabilitate Aristotle’s theory of natural justice and the book ends with a series of proposals for correcting the legal system.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Property and Justice.J. W. Harris - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Legal ethics: a comparative study.Geoffrey C. Hazard - 2004 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Angelo Dondi.
Book notes. [REVIEW]Ian Little & Myra Kay Broach - 1988 - Criminal Justice Ethics 7 (1):87-87.
Review essay / Can a lawyer be happy?M. B. E. Smith - 2000 - Criminal Justice Ethics 19 (2):44-52.
Justice in robes.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 2006 - Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.
To What Should Lawyers Be Faithful?Alice Woolley - 2012 - Criminal Justice Ethics 31 (2):124-136.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-03-18

Downloads
22 (#705,671)

6 months
4 (#776,943)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references