Commentary: How much should lawyers know when picking a jury?

Criminal Justice Ethics 24 (2):2-54 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

No abstract

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1080/0731129x.2005.9992183

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Condorcet's Jury Theorem and the Optimum Number of Voters.Jason Brennan - forthcoming - POLITICS.
A tale of two waivers: Waiver of the jury waiver defense under the federal rules of civil procedure.Jarod Spencer Gonzalez - unknown
The right to trial by jury.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (2):197–212.
Should lawyers listen to philosophers about legal ethics?M. B. E. Smith - 1990 - Law and Philosophy 9 (1):67 - 93.
A defence of jury nullification.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (4):401-423.
Re-justifying the fair cross section requirement: Equal representation and enfranchisement in the american criminal jury.Richard M. Re - unknown
Learning juror competence: a generalized Condorcet Jury Theorem.Jan-Willem Romeijn & David Atkinson - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (3):237-262.
In support of fraud trials without a jury.Sally Serena Ramage - 2005 - The Criminal Lawyer 156 (156):1-176.
The plea jury.Laura I. Appleman - unknown
The michigan supreme court diminishes the right to trial by jury in civil cases.Robert A. Sedler - manuscript

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
21 (#676,185)

6 months
6 (#349,140)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references