L'humour macabre : un mécanisme de défense acceptable en soins critiques?

Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique 1 (2):69-75 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Health care professionals assigned to critical care are confronted on a daily basis with particularly trying situations. Their hard work conditions can become anxiety-provoking, affect their physical and/or psychological condition, decrease their performance and increase their absenteeism rate at work. To face this particularly stressful and sometimes depressing context, some professionals fall back on “gallows humour”, a sort of black humour with a morbid overtone, which is likely to shock certain people. Although gallows humour is very widespread, its use in critical care is extremely controversial and most of the time reprimanded by professional orders. Based on the codes of ethics that govern them, professional orders assume that gallows humour violates the duties and responsibilities of their members towards their patients, rejecting its use straightaway. In this article, we contest the categorical rejection of gallows humour in critical care. We adopt a consequentialist perspective based on the study of scientific literature on the benefits of using humour in the workplace, to defend its ethical acceptability. By enabling us to be better prepared to provide care despite the tragic events experienced by professionals, we will see how the use of gallows humour can ultimately have a positive effect on patients. A consequentialist ethics is not only interested in maximizing the benefits of gallows humour but also in reducing the risk of harm to others related to its use. This important criterion will therefore lead us to define the terms and suggest certain conditions that must be respected for an ethical use of this important defense mechanism by health care professionals in critical care.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,826

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

L'humour macabre: un mécanisme de défense acceptable en soins critiques?Alexandra Fortin & Charles Dupras - 2018 - Canadian Journal of Bioethics/Revue canadienne de bioéthique 1 (2):69-75.
A Philosophy of Humour.Alan Roberts - 2019 - London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
Humour in Nietzsche's style.Charles Boddicker - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (2):447-458.
The bergsonism of cazamian's conception of humour.M. Sevcik - 2007 - Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aestetics; Until 2008: Estetika (Aesthetics) 44 (1-4).
On Humour.Simon Critchley - 2002 - Routledge.
Humour as a Conduit of Political Subversion in Rome.Jan M. Van der Molen - Jun 4, 2020 - Classics, Medieval and Early Modern Studies: Tracing Humour Conference.
On Humour.Simon Critchley - 2002 - Routledge.
Holiness and humour.Anita Houck - 2016 - HTS Theological Studies 72 (4):1-8.
The Wit and Humour of Principia Mathematica.Kenneth Blackwell - 2011 - Russell: The Journal of Bertrand Russell Studies 31 (1).
Entre satire et humour, Shaftesbury et le thé'tre élisabéthain.Françoise Badelon - 1999 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2:161-172.
Is a Sense of Humour a Virtue?John Lippitt - 2005 - The Monist 88 (1):72-92.


Added to PP

2 (#1,431,718)

6 months
1 (#479,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references