Locke and George on Original Acquisition

Abstract

Natural resources, especially land, play an important role in many economic problems society faces today, including the climate crisis, housing shortages and severe inequality. Yet, land has been either entirely neglected or seriously misunderstood by contemporary theorists of distributive justice. I aim to correct that in this paper. In his theory of original acquisition, Locke did not carefully distinguish between the value of natural resources and the value that we add by laboring upon them. This oversight led him to the mistaken conclusion that labor mixing gives the laborer an entitlement to both the improvement and the resource. I explain how Locke's false belief that the proviso was satisfied in his time was the fundamental cause of this error. Instead, we should think, following Henry George, that the community is entitled to the economic value of natural resources, because the community created the value of resources, not the individual improver. I discuss an argument from George's "Progress and Poverty" that selfownership is actually inconsistent with (rather than the ground for, as Locke thought) private appropriation of natural resources. I present George's argument that private appropriation of natural resources is akin to forced labor, which is remarkably similar to Nozick's infamous argument that taxation is akin to forced labor. I then develop my own view of original acquisition, inspired by George. The selfownership of improvers gives them an entitlement to improvements that they generate. But the self-ownership of everyone else precludes an entitlement to natural resources value. Natural resource rents should not be enjoyed only by those who improve the resource, but rather, by all community members in proportion to the share of demand for natural resources they are responsible for. In the last section, I consider and refute an objection from the luck egalitarian claiming that natural talents are relevantly similar to land.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Perceived (In)justice of Public Land Acquisition.S. M. Holtslag-Broekhof, R. van Marwijk, R. Beunen & J. S. C. Wiskerke - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):167-184.
Perceived (In)justice of Public Land Acquisition.S. M. Holtslag-Broekhof, R. Marwijk, R. Beunen & J. S. C. Wiskerke - 2016 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (2):167-184.
Original acquisition of private property.L. Wenar - 1998 - Mind 107 (428):799-820.
Knowledge of language and phrasal vocabulary acquisition.Koenraad Kuiper - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (3):291-292.
Original Acquisition Today.Michael Vincent - 2010 - Emergent Australasian Philosophers 3 (1).
Locke's Labor Theory of Original Appropriation: Philosophical Significance and Implications.Simeon Wyckliffe Hebert - 1993 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-26

Downloads
79 (#212,335)

6 months
79 (#61,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Forrester
Yale University (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references