Conceptual Role Semantics and Naturalizing Meaning

Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (24):337-348 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I will do three things. One, to explain why conceptual role semantics seems an attractive theory of meaning (I). Two, to sketch a version of it which has a good chance of withstanding some of the standard objections (II-III). Three, to see what follows from this version with respect to the naturalization of meaning (IV)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Conceptual role semantics for moral terms.Ralph Wedgwood - 2001 - Philosophical Review 110 (1):1-30.
Conceptual Role Accounts of Meaning in Metaethics.Matthew Chrisman - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 260-274.
The meaning of 'ought'.Ralph Wedgwood - 2006 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics: Volume 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 127-160.
Conceptual engineering, speaker-meaning and philosophy.Mark Pinder - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-27

Downloads
82 (#209,892)

6 months
561 (#2,530)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gábor Forrai
Eotvos Lorand University of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references