Of Mice and Men: Adorno on Art and the Suffering of Animals

Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):139-156 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Theodor W. Adorno’s criticism of human beings’ domination of nature is a familiar topic to Adorno scholars. Its connection to the central relationship between art and nature in his aesthetics has, however, been less analysed. In the following paper, I claim that Adorno’s discussion of art’s truth content (Wahrheitsgehalt) is to be understood as art’s ability to give voice to nature (both human and non-human) since it has been subjugated by the growth of civilization. I focus on repressed non-human nature and examine Adorno’s interpretation of Eduard Mörike’s poem ‘Mausfallen-Sprüchlein’ (Mousetrap rhyme). By giving voice to the repressed animal, Mörike’s poem manages to point towards the possibility of a changed relationship between mice and men, between nature and humanity, which is necessary in order to achieve reconciliation amongst humans as well

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Adorno and the disenchantment of nature.Alison Stone - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):231-253.
Kant, Adorno and the work of art.Murray W. Skees - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):915-933.
Adorno and Proust on the recovery of experience.Roger Foster - 2007 - Critical Horizons 8 (2):169-185.
The Artwork and the Promesse du Bonheur in Adorno.James Gordon Finlayson - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):392-419.
Adorno’s critical materialism.Deborah Cook - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):719-737.
Aesthetics, Ethics and Nature in Adorno.Eric S. Nelson - 2008 - In Jerome Carroll, Steve Giles & Maike Oergel (eds.), Aesthetics and modernity from Schiller to the Frankfurt School. New York: Peter Lang.
Nature, red in tooth and claw.Deborah Cook - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):49-72.
Adorno vs. Levinas: Evaluating points of contention. [REVIEW]Nick Smith - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):275-306.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-11-19

Downloads
67 (#241,904)

6 months
5 (#626,659)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Camilla Flodin
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

Adorno and Schelling on the art–nature relation.Camilla Flodin - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):176-196.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references