Adorno and Schelling on the art–nature relation

British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):176-196 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When it comes to the relationship between art and nature, research on Adorno’s aesthetics usually centres on his discussion of Kant and Hegel. While this reflects Adorno’s own position – his comprehension of this relationship is to a large extent developed through a critical re-reading of both the Kantian and the Hegelian position – I argue that we are able to gain important insights into Adorno’s aesthetics and the central art–nature relation by reading his ideas in the light of Schelling’s conception of this relationship. The article focuses on the similarities between Schelling’s notion of nature’s productivity and Adorno’s understanding of natural beauty. It concludes with a discussion on Adorno’s re-evaluation of the reconciliatory power of the exemplary unity of the artwork in conjunction with Schelling’s comparison between artwork and organism, as well as his concept of the construction of nature.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Dialectics and the Transcendence of Dialectics: Adorno's Relation to Schelling.Peter Dews - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1180-1207.
Of Mice and Men: Adorno on Art and the Suffering of Animals.Camilla Flodin - 2011 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):139-156.
Adorno and Schelling: How to ‘Turn Philosophical Thought Towards the Non-Identical’.Franck Fischbach - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1167-1179.
Adorno on Nature.Deborah Cook - 2011 - Routledge.
Nature, red in tooth and claw.Deborah Cook - 2007 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (1):49-72.
Aesthetics, Ethics and Nature in Adorno.Eric S. Nelson - 2008 - In Jerome Carroll, Steve Giles & Maike Oergel (eds.), Aesthetics and modernity from Schiller to the Frankfurt School. New York: Peter Lang.
Art and Myth: Adorno and Heidegger.David Roberts - 1987 - Thesis Eleven 58 (1):19-34.
Adorno and the disenchantment of nature.Alison Stone - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):231-253.
Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’.Rolf Tiedemann & Rodney Livingstone (eds.) - 2001 - Stanford University Press.
Adorno’s critical materialism.Deborah Cook - 2006 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (6):719-737.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-16

Downloads
55 (#278,841)

6 months
15 (#145,565)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Camilla Flodin
Uppsala University

Citations of this work

The Aesthetics of Natural History.Tobias Heinze - 2023 - Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 43 (1):136-138.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of the power of judgment.Immanuel Kant - 2000 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Paul Guyer.
Aesthetic Theory.Theodor W. Adorno, Gretel Adorno, Rolf Tiedemann & C. Lenhardt - 1986 - Journal of Philosophy 83 (12):732-741.
Adorno: Disenchantment and Ethics.J. M. Bernstein - 2001 - New York: Cambridge University Press.

View all 21 references / Add more references