- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Totipotency and the moral status of embryos: New problems for an old argument
Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (1):108–122 (2004)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Ethical Realism, written by William J. FitzPatrick.N. D. Cannon - forthcoming - Journal of Moral Philosophy.
William J. Fitzpatrick, Teleology and the Norms of Nature. [REVIEW]Brian Garrett - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21:419-422.
William J. Fitzpatrick, Teleology and the Norms of Nature Reviewed by.Brian Garrett - 2001 - Philosophy in Review 21 (6):419-422.
Review of Teleology and the Norms of Nature, by William J. Fitzpatrick. [REVIEW]Jonathan J. Sanford - 2004 - Essays in Philosophy 5 (1):230-232.
Vulnerable Embryos.Stephen Napier - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (4):781-810.
Ways Out of the Patenting Prohibition? Human Parthenogenetic and Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Hannah Schickl, Matthias Braun & Peter Dabrock - 2017 - Bioethics 31 (5):409-417.
Justification for Stem Cell Research Considering Embryos Have Some Moral Status.Elizabeth Ingram - 2020 - Voices in Bioethics 6.
Applied ethics and social problems: moral questions of birth, society and death.Tony Fitzpatrick - 2008 - Bristol: Policy Press.
Human embryonic stem cell research and the discarded embryo argument.Mark Moller - 2009 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30 (2):131-145.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
63 (#89,047)
6 months
12 (#1,086,452)
2009-01-28
Downloads
63 (#89,047)
6 months
12 (#1,086,452)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Argument from Potentiality in the Embryo Protection Debate: Finally “Depotentialized”?Marco Stier & Bettina Schoene-Seifert - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):19-27.
“More on respect for embryos and potentiality: Does respect for embryos entail respect for in vitro embryos?”.Stephen S. Hanson - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (3):215-226.
Prematurely Depotentialized? Ethical Nonnaturalism and the Absurdest-Extension Objection.Sebastian Muders & Markus Ruether - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):34-36.
The Cognitive Psychology of the Potentiality Argument.Lincoln Frias & Noel Struchiner - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):36-38.
References found in this work
Respecting What We Destroy: Reflections on Human Embryo Research.Michael J. Meyer & Lawrence J. Nelson - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (1):16-23.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6686886f5-kkm7k uwo