Myth, Memory, and History

History and Theory 4 (3):281-302 (1965)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle and other Greeks contrasted history and poetry because epic poetry or myth was an alternate way of apprehending the past. Myth was accepted as no less factual than history, being distinguished by its lack of any coherent dating scheme. Even Herodotus and Thucydides could not write a true history of early Greece; they were necessarily confined to contemporary history. The problem is not why Greek culture was "unhistorical," but rather why anyone should have proceeded from myth to history. Their traditional mythic understanding of the past, operating similarly to patterns of memory observable in other cultures, preserved relevant information at the cost of massive loss of data, which appears to survive only in random fashion

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Myth, History, and Theory.Peter Heehs - 1994 - History and Theory 33 (1):1-19.
Transformations between history and memory.Aleida Assmann - 2008 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (1):49-72.
Myth as archive.Vanda Zajko - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (4):103-119.
The Myth of Irish Identity.Daniel Finbar O'kane - 1982 - Dissertation, Drew University
Cosmogonic Myth and 'Sacred History'.Mircea Eliade - 1967 - Religious Studies 2 (2):171 - 183.
The Myth of Historical Evidence.B. C. Hurst - 1981 - History and Theory 20 (3):278-290.
Memory and History.Dmitri Nikulin - 2008 - Idealistic Studies 38 (1-2):75-90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-04

Downloads
67 (#241,771)

6 months
7 (#419,182)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references