Armstrong on Relational and Nonrelational Realism

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62 (3):262-71 (1981)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper considers and criticizes david armstrong's defense in his book of an allegedly nonrelational version of realism, "universals and scientific realism". It also challenges his claim that plato, But not aristotle, Held a relational version of realism.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

2017

DOI

10.1111/j.1468-0114.1981.tb00064.x

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,672

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Predication and the Problem of Universals.Catherine Legg - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (2):117-143.
David Armstrong and realism about colour.K. Campbell - 1993 - In John Bacon, K. Campbell & Lloyd Reinhardt (eds.), Ontology, Causality, and Mind. Cambridge University Press.
Critical Realism and Relational Sociology: Complementarity and Synergy.Margaret Archer - 2010 - Journal of Critical Realism 9 (2):199-207.
Nominalism and Realism. Universals and Scientific Realism Volume I.David Malet Armstrong - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.
Universals and Scientific Realism: Nominalism and Realism Vol. I.David M. Armstrong - 1978 - Cambridge University Press.
Relational, non-relational, and mixed theories of experience.Richard A. Fumerton - 2000 - In The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center. pp. 21-28.
Mr Arthadeva and naive realism.David M. Armstrong - 1959 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37 (1):67-70.
Universals and scientific realism.David Malet Armstrong - 1978 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Are there irreducibly relational facts.Josh Parsons - 2009 - In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-Making. Acumen Publishing. pp. 217-226.
Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: Reinhardt Grossmann – David M. Armstrong Metaphysical Correspondence – Edited by Javier Cumpa and Erwin Tegtmeier.Herbert Hochberg - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (3):447-451.
Universals and scientific realism, vol 1, nominalism and realism, vol 2, a theory of universals - Armstrong,dm.B. Aune - unknown
”Ostrich Nominalism’ or ”Mirage Realism’?Michael Devitt - 1980 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 61 (4):433-439.
Review of Javier cumpa, Erwin Tegtmeier (eds.), Phenomenological Realism Versus Scientific Realism: Reinhardt Grossmann - David M. Armstrong: Metaphysical Correspondence. [REVIEW]Joseph K. Cosgrove - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (10).
Projection and realism in Hume's philosophy.P. J. E. Kail - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
In Defense of Relational Direct Realism.Kenneth Hobson - 2011 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):550-574.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-01-05

Downloads
15 (#942,606)

6 months
1 (#1,462,504)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gail Fine
Cornell University

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references