Is There Any Truth in Art?: Aesthetical Considerations

Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (2):551-561 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper discusses the question if there is any truth in art. Initially it poses the question whether artworks are just mere appearances or whether they have a special truth. In critical reflection on Heidegger’s conception of art as the “setting-itself-to-work of truth” this question is then elaborated and answered: The appearance character of artworks cannot be conceived as truth. What true artworks show, namely mere possibilities, is beyond truth, because it does not belong to the real world. Artworks are not true; in their decentered order and their self-showing nature they are beautiful.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,592

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Does belief (only) aim at the truth?Daniel Whiting - 2012 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 93 (2):279-300.
Truth and meaning redux.Ernie Lepore & Kirk Ludwig - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):251-77.
Should I Believe the Truth?Daniel Whiting - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (2):213-224.
Religion and the pursuit of truth.Brian Zamulinski - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (1):43-60.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-27

Downloads
32 (#495,901)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references