An analysis of common arguments against Advance Directives

Nursing Ethics 19 (2):245-251 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Advance Directives are under-utilized, both from the fact that few Americans have them and that health professionals don’t always rely on Advance Directives provided by patients. Many health professionals have philosophical objections to their use. Using a fictitious case as background, five different objections to the use of Advance Directives will be discussed and arguments against those objections will be posed along with suggestions to improve Advance Directives

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advance Directives and Personal Identity: What Is the Problem?E. Furberg - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):60-73.
Precedent autonomy and personal identity.Michael Quante - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):365-381.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-04

Downloads
153 (#126,579)

6 months
4 (#853,525)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Personal identity.Derek Parfit - 1971 - Philosophical Review 80 (January):3-27.
Precedent autonomy and personal identity.Michael Quante - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):365-381.
Substituting Authenticity for Autonomy.Rebecca Dresser - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (2):3-3.

Add more references