Richard Falckenberg and the modernity of Nicholas of Cusa

Viator 47 (2):351--366 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Richard Falckenberg (1851-1920) in his book Grundzüge der Philosophie des Nicolaus Cusanus mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Lehre vom Erkennen was among the first historians of philosophy to support the argument that Nicholas of Cusa was a modern philosopher because his innovative theory of knowledge. The Falckenberg's celebrity shall be reduced because he was later obscured by the most famous historians of philosophy as Ernst Cassirer and Joachim Ritter. In our paper we want to come back to the Falckenberg's book and recover his main arguments about the proximity of Cusanus with the philosophies of Leibniz, Fichte and the positivists.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,881

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Nicholas of cusa (1401–1464): First modern philosopher?Jasper Hopkins - 2002 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 26 (1):13–29.
Pantheism from John Scottus Eriugena to Nicholas of Cusa.Dermot Moran - 1990 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64 (1):131-152.
Nicholas of Cusa’s De pace fidei and the meta-exclusivism of religious pluralism.Scott F. Aikin & Jason Aleksander - 2013 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):219-235.
Becoming God: The Doctrine of Theosis in Nicholas of Cusa (review).Thomas M. Izbicki - 2007 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):660-661.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-18

Downloads
66 (#246,032)

6 months
6 (#520,848)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrea Fiamma
Università degli Studi di Milano

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references