Religious Studies 28 (2):185-194 (1992)
AbstractEver since the Proslogion was first circulated , critics have been bemused by St Anselm's brazen attempt to establish a matter of fact, namely, God's existence, from the simple analysis of a term or concept. Yet every critic who has proposed to ‘write the obituary’ of the Ontological Argument has found it to be remarkably resilient . At the risk of adding to a record of failures, I want to venture a new method for attacking this durable argument. Neither the common version of Anselm's argument from Chapter II of the Proslogion nor the previously unrecognized modal version uncovered by Norman Malcolm from Pros , III can possibly get under way without Anselm's celebrated assertion that God is that than which no greater can be conceived
Similar books and articles
Reading Anselm's Proslogion: The History of Anselm's Argument and its Significance Today.Ian Logan - 2008 - Ashgate.
Anselm's "Proslogion" Argument: A Metaphysics of Creation.Floyd Edwin Wike - 1980 - Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University
What Does the Second Form of the Ontological Argument Prove?H. Jong Kim - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 56 (1):17 - 40.
Anselm's Argumentum and the Early Medieval Theory of Argument.Toivo Holopainen - 2007 - Vivarium 45 (1):1-29.
Saint Anselm's Ontological Argument and Some Recent Interpretations.Barbara Asuntha Chiang - 1982 - Dissertation, The Catholic University of America
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads