Nietzsche Contra “Self-Reformulation”

Studies in Philosophy and Education 24 (2):85-111 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Not only do the writings of Nietzsche – early and late – fail to support the pedagogy of self-reformulation, this doctrine embodies what for him is worst in man and would destroy that which is higher. The pedagogy of self-reformulation is also incoherent. In contrast, Nietzsche offers a fruitful and comprehensive theory of education that, while non-democratic and contemptuous of egalitarian aspirations, emerges consistently from his metaphysics and philosophical anthropology. Whatever, then, we might think of his premises, Nietzsche’s philosophy of education represents an attractive model for those who would develop a meaningful, distinctive, and persuasive educational theory. It defines a domain of the possible and then straightforwardly states what is and is not to be done within it – and why.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,779

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-08-28

Downloads
24 (#644,067)

6 months
1 (#1,720,529)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jessica Fennell
University of Vermont

References found in this work

Schopenhauer as educator.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1965 - Chicago,: Regenery. Edited by Eliseo Vivas.
Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Antichrist.Walter Arnold Kaufmann - 1950 - Princeton: Princeton University Press. Edited by Alexander Nehamas.
Nietzsche, philosopher, psychologist, antichrist.Walter Arnold Kaufmann - 1950 - Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Edited by Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche.

View all 7 references / Add more references