Mind and body: An apparent perceptual error

Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (3):393-405 (1991)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A process model of concept development is proposed as a means of understanding the mind body problem. This paper reviews some definitions and views of mind, reiterates Karl Popper's description of the development of scientific as compared to essentialist methods of concept definition, compares the development of physical and psychological concepts, notes an apparent illogic of the mind and body issue, and discusses a range of psychological theories in relation to this process model, that is, Skinner's behavior view, to Pribram's presentation of cognitive theory, to Epstein's theory of the self concept, and to existentialistic views. In terms of meaning and usefulness, mind and behavioral concepts appear to evolve in the same manner

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Descartes, Mind-Body Union, and Holenmerism.Marleen Rozemond - 2003 - Philosophical Topics 31 (1-2):343-367.
Not mind-body but mind-mind.Carol A. Rovane - 2000 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (4):82-92.
Can we solve the mind-body problem?Colin McGinn - 1989 - Mind 98 (July):349-66.
The Nature of Mind.David M. Rosenthal (ed.) - 1991 - Oxford University Press.
Mind-Body Identity Theories.Cynthia Macdonald - 1989 - New York: Routledge.
Mind-body, body-mind: Two distinct problems.Benny Shanon - 2008 - Philosophical Psychology 21 (5):697 – 701.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
13 (#1,032,575)

6 months
2 (#1,188,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references