Time and Mctaggart's Paradox

Dissertation, University of Virginia (1989)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I show that McTaggart's Paradox does not demonstrate that tensed time, when tensed time and the paradox are understood as they should be, is incoherent. However, important intuitions appear to underlie McTaggart's Paradox. ;I explain what I mean by tensed time. It means that not all moments of time are equally real. Tensed time is a matter of ontology; it is not primarily a matter of grammar. The variety in tensed and tenseless views is indicated, and the view is rejected that the tensed and the tenseless ways are compatible with one another. It is argued that 'real' is robust enough to support the description of tensed time, and it is indicated how the ontological views of tensed and tenseless time differ in terms of becoming, the present and the spacetime continuum. ;I argue that McTaggart's Paradox, as McTaggart actually presented it, does not present as clear a case for a contradiction in time as McTaggart intended. In one sense, McTaggart's actual argument does establish a contradiction; in another sense, it does not. I indicate that McTaggart's account is unclear unless a statement of the perceived contradiction includes specification of the implicit assumptions. I analyze McTaggart's account. For example, I argue that the infinite regress part of McTaggart's argument is not persuasive. ;I offer two reconstructions of McTaggart's argument, presenting real contradictions. I suggest that some alternative ways of reconstructing a real contradiction appear flawed. For example, it is unsatisfactory to specify the contradiction in terms of a totality of facts about temporal properties. I argue that it is also unsatisfactory to focus on the claim that events are instantaneous. ;I argue that Broad offers a successful A-theory response to the contradiction in the form that McTaggart presented it and to my first reformulation. I offer a supplementary argument. I explain that recognizing a distinction between matters of predication and of ontology provides an effective response to the contradiction as McTaggart presented it and to both of my reformulations.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,069

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Farewell to McTaggart’s Argument?Michael Tooley - 2010 - Philosophia 38 (2):243-255.
The pervasive paradox of tense.Heather Dyke - 2001 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):103-124.
A Token-based Semantic Analysis of McTaggart's Paradox.Cheng-Chih Tsai - 2011 - Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 10:107-124.
On McTaggart's Theory of Time.Edward Freeman - 2010 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 27 (4):389-401.
Back to the present.Thomas Baldwin - 1999 - Philosophy 74 (2):177-197.
Mctaggart, Dummett, and Time.Carl Stephen Woolf - 1985 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references