Relational Obligations

Stance 3 (1):39-46 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper attempts to demonstrate that special responsibilities exist as a necessary and fundamental component of relationships. It seeks to show that, while special responsibilities may be superseded by other relevant concerns, they remain absolute. The paper attempts to demonstrate further that, even in cases of repugnant conclusion, special responsibilities exhibit a residual nature. It argues that such obligations are not always voluntary entered, but nevertheless represent prima facie duties to those parties involved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,571

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Associative political obligations.A. John Simmons - 1996 - Ethics 106 (2):247-273.
Relational Complexes.Joop Leo - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (2):357-390.
Filial Obligations: A Comparative Study.Cecilia Wee - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (1):83-97.
Does obligation diminish with distance?Gillian Brock - 2005 - Ethics, Place and Environment 8 (1):3 – 20.
Relational being: beyond self and community.Kenneth J. Gergen - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Parental Obligation.Nellie Wieland - 2011 - Utilitas 23 (3):249-267.
External justifications and institutional roles.A. John Simmons - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (1):28-36.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
5 (#1,533,504)

6 months
1 (#1,469,469)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references