Adequacy Results for Some Priorean Modal Propositional Logics

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):236-249 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Standard possible world semantics for propositional modal languages ignore truth-value gaps. However, simple considerations suggest that it should not be so. In Section 1, I identify what I take to be a correct truth-clause for necessity under the assumption that some possible worlds are incomplete (i.e., "at" which some propositions lack a truth-value). In Section 2, I build a world semantics, the semantics of TV-models, for standard modal propositional languages, which agrees with the truth-clause for necessity previously identified. Sections 3–5 are devoted to systematic concerns. In particular, in Section 4, Prior’s system Q (propositional version) is given a TV-models semantics and proved adequate (i.e., sound and complete) with respect to it.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Incompleteness results in Kripke semantics.Silvio Ghilardi - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):517-538.
Kripke bundle semantics and c-set semantics.Eiko Isoda - 1997 - Studia Logica 58 (3):395-401.
Kripke semantics for modal substructural logics.Norihiro Kamide - 2002 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 11 (4):453-470.
A simple propositional S5 tableau system.Melvin Fitting - 1999 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 96 (1-3):107-115.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
67 (#239,192)

6 months
14 (#171,169)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Fabrice Correia
University of Geneva

References found in this work

Some Modal Logics Based on a Three-Valued Logic.Krister Segerberg - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):309-310.

Add more references