Is Buddhist Karmic Theory False?: J. E. WHITE

Religious Studies 19 (2):223-228 (1983)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In his recent article ‘Notes Towards a Critique of Buddhist Karmic Theory’ Paul J. Griffiths makes four criticisms of Buddhist karmic theory: it is empirically false, it is incoherent, it is morally repugnant, and it is vacuous. After listing these four criticisms, Griffiths concludes that ‘all these mean that Buddhist karmic theory as expounded in the major theoretical works devoted to it must be false’.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

‘True’ and Truth.Avrum Stroll & Henry Alexander - 1975 - Philosophy of Science 42 (4):384-410.
The first argument for sarv Stiv da.David Bastow - 1995 - Asian Philosophy 5 (2):109 – 125.
Buddhist Belief ‘In’.F. J. Hoffman - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (3):381-387.
Buddhist ethics: A review essay. [REVIEW]Maria Heim - 2011 - Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (3):571-584.
Buddhist Belief ‘In’: F. J. HOFFMAN.F. J. Hoffman - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (3):381-387.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
45 (#352,002)

6 months
6 (#510,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Emptiness: A Study in Religious Meaning.Frederick J. Streng - 1968 - Religious Studies 4 (1):168-169.

Add more references