- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Two-steps-in-one-proof: The structure of the transcendental deduction of the categories
Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (4):553-570 (1990)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
The proof-structure of Kant's transcendental deduction.Dieter Henrich - 1982 - In Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason. Oxford University Press. pp. 640 - 659.
How Does Kant Prove That We Perceive, and Not Merely Imagine, Physical Objects?Kenneth R. Westphal - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (4):781-806.
Where have all the categories gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's reading of Kant's transcendental deduction.Henry E. Allison - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):67 – 80.
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
The Proof-Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction.Dieter Henrich - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):640-659.
Dieter Henrich et «The Proof-Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction». Réflexions critiques.Raymond Brouillet - 1975 - Dialogue 14 (4):639-648.
Fate and the fortune of the categories: Kant on the usurpation and schematization of concepts.Peter Thielke - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (5):438 – 468.
Some Steps Towards a Transcendental Deduction of Quantum Mechanics.Michel Bitbol - 1998 - Philosophia Naturalis 35:253-280.
Is Kant’s transcendental deduction of the categories fit for purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
81 (#205,911)
6 months
4 (#776,943)
2009-01-28
Downloads
81 (#205,911)
6 months
4 (#776,943)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition: On the Note to B160 in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.Christian Onof & Dennis Schulting - 2015 - Philosophical Review 124 (1):1-58.
Empirical consciousness explained: Self-affection, (self-)consciousness and perception in the B deduction.Corey W. Dyck - 2006 - Kantian Review 11:29-54.
Kant and the Most Difficult Thing That Could Ever Be Undertaken on Behalf of Metaphysics.Justin B. Shaddock - 2014 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 31 (1).
The Second Step of the B‐Deduction.Frederick Rauscher - 2012 - European Journal of Philosophy 22 (3):396-419.
Why Reflective Equilibrium? II: Following Up on Rawls's Comparison of His Own Approach with a Kantian Approach.Svein Eng - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (2):288-310.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-pjbg5 uwo