Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):640-659 (1969)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Hence, there is still controversy over which of the two versions of the deduction deserves priority and whether indeed any distinction between them can be maintained that would go beyond questions of presentation and involve the structure of the proof itself. Schopenhauer and Heidegger held that the first edition alone fully expresses Kant's unique philosophy, while Kant himself, as well as many other Kantians, have only seen a difference in the method of presentation.
|
Keywords | Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy General Interest |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0034-6632 |
DOI | revmetaph196922481 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition: On the Note to B160 in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.Christian Onof & Dennis Schulting - 2015 - Philosophical Review 124 (1):1-58.
Is Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
Kant on the Original Synthesis of Understanding and Sensibility.Jessica J. Williams - 2018 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 26 (1):66-86.
A Peculiar Intuition: Kant's Conceptualist Account of Perception.Nathan Bauer - 2012 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 55 (3):215-237.
View all 42 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
The Proof-Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction.Dieter Henrich - 1982 - In Ralph Charles Sutherland Walker (ed.), Kant on Pure Reason. Oxford University Press. pp. 640 - 659.
Dieter Henrich Et «The Proof-Structure of Kant's Transcendental Deduction». Réflexions Critiques.Raymond Brouillet - 1975 - Dialogue 14 (4):639-648.
Kant’s Deduction From Apperception: An Essay on the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2019 - Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
Is Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories Fit for Purpose?Anil Gomes - 2010 - Kantian Review 15 (2):118-137.
How Does Kant Prove That We Perceive, and Not Merely Imagine, Physical Objects?Kenneth R. Westphal - 2006 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (4):781 - 806.
Kant's Legal Metaphor and the Nature of a Deduction.Ian Proops - 2003 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 41 (2):209-229.
Kant on the Transcendental Deduction of Space and Time: An Essay on the Philosophical Resources of the Transcendental Aesthetic.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2010 - Kantian Review 14 (2):1-37.
Where Have All the Categories Gone? Reflections on Longuenesse's Reading of Kant's Transcendental Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (1):67 – 80.
Kant’s Deduction and Apperception: Explaining the Categories.Dennis Schulting - 2012 - London and Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Kant’s Non-Conceptualism, Rogue Objects, and The Gap in the B Deduction.Robert Hanna - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):399 - 415.
Two-Steps-in-One-Proof: The Structure of the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories.J. Claude Evans - 1990 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (4):553-570.
Apperception and Analyticity in the B-Deduction.Henry E. Allison - 1993 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 44 (1):233-252.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-02-20
Total views
220 ( #52,293 of 2,517,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #40,715 of 2,517,879 )
2011-02-20
Total views
220 ( #52,293 of 2,517,879 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #40,715 of 2,517,879 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads