The Possibility of Making a Muslim Philosophy of Religion with the Concepts of the West: How Possible is it to Relate the Concepts of Theism, Atheism and Deism to Islamic Thought?

Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 26 (3):971-986 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this study, the drawbacks of using some religious concepts produced in the tradition of Western thought directly in their studies on Islamic belief will be discussed. The claim in question will be put forward within the framework of the concepts of deism, atheism and especially theism. Especially by reviewing the philosophy of religion studies made in Turkey, the fact that the three concepts mentioned are directly transferred to the philosophy of religion studies carried out in the Islamic world will be revealed as a problem and this situation will be defined as the reduction of Islamic belief to some other concepts. The aim to be achieved by emphasizing such a problem is to ensure that the principles of Islamic belief are understood in their own meaning without reducing them to other meanings. Because every concept produced within the tradition of Western thought is directly related to its own intellectual and practical past. For this reason, when a solution or criticism that is formed in a different sense or dependent on a certain practical past is brought to Islamic thought, the philosophical and practical past of those concepts will also be carried. However, every belief should be evaluated by considering its own meaning and history. Evaluating this problem through concepts that Islam directly rejects, such as deism and atheism, is more understandable than the concept of theism. However, when it comes to the concept of theism, the subject becomes quite complex. Because in almost all sources, Islam is defined as a theistic religion and this is considered as a necessary pre-acceptance for the Islamic belief. However, theism is the understanding of God in modern Western thought, in which Descartes rationalism and Newtonian mechanics are accepted as the dominant element. Such an understanding of God, built within the epistemic boundaries of the thinking subject, is incompatible with the Islamic conception of God.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mustafa Çevik'in 'Müslümanca Demokrasi' Düşüncesinin Eleştirisi.Bekir Geçit - 2016 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):295-312.
Analitik Bilim Felsefesi.Ali Rıza Erdem - 2021 - Ankara, Türkiye: Anı Yayıncılık.
Schools of Islamic Philosophy in Melāyē Jizīrī’s Dīwān.Mehmet Nesim Doru - 2016 - Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):19-39.
Bilim Felsefesi Bilim Pratiğinden Ne Öğrenebilir?A. Dinçer Çevik - 2020 - Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 7 (2):110-132.
Sporun felsefi̇ boyutlarinin değerlendi̇ri̇lmesi̇.Ersin Afacan & Nazmi Avci - 2019 - Tabula Rasa: Felsefe Ve Teoloji 31:85-95.
Merleau-Ponty’nin Bedenlenme Fenomenolojisi.Aysun Aydin - 2020 - Kilikya Felsefe Dergisi / Cilicia Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):77-90.
K. Rousseau'nun düșünce dünyasinda stoa felsefesinin izleri.Tezcan Kaplan - 2018 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 11 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-07-29

Downloads
12 (#1,085,763)

6 months
8 (#361,341)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references