Ten Reasons Why E. H. Gombrich is not Connected to Art History

Human Affairs 19 (3):304-310 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Ten Reasons Why E. H. Gombrich is not Connected to Art History This is a speculative essay on the place of E. H. Gombrich in art history. Gombrich is universally known, and still often studied at the undergraduate and graduate levels. He is indispensable for the historiography of the discipline. But at the same time, he is not often cited, and his work is not usually part of the ongoing conversations of the current state of art history or visual studies. This brief essay questions that condition.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,475

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

David carrier's art history.Jonathan Gilmore - 1995 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 53 (1):39-47.
Pictorial perception as illusion.Katerina Bantinaki - 2007 - British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (3):268-279.
Gombrich and Cultural History.Dan Karlholm - 1994 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 7 (12).
“Reckless Inaccuracies Abounding”: André Malraux and the Birth of a Myth.Derek Allan - 2009 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 67 (2):147-158..
Definably connected nonconnected sets.Antongiulio Fornasiero - 2012 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 58 (1):125-126.
Reasons for action: Justification vs. explanation.James Lenman - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-20

Downloads
30 (#527,864)

6 months
3 (#974,323)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Elkins
School of the Art Institute of Chicago

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references