The Validity of Aquinas’ Third Way

New Scholasticism 45 (1):117-126 (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues for the formal validity of and the truth of the premises and conclusion of a version of Aquinas' "Third Way" that says: If each of the parts of nature is contingent, the whole of nature is contingent. Each of the parts of nature is contingent. Therefore, the whole of nature is contingent--where "contingent" means having a cause and not existing self-sufficiently.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cosmological Argument: A Pragmatic Defense.Evan Sandsmark & Jason L. Megill - 2010 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 2 (1):127 - 142.
Aquinas’ Third Way Modalized.Robert E. Maydole - 1998 - The Paideia Archive: Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 36:147-155.
Infinite Time and Contingent Beings: Aquinas’s Third Way Revisited.Christopher Gilbert - 2020 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 102 (2):189-208.
Williamson and the Contingent A Priori.Graham Oppy - 1987 - Analysis 47 (4):188 - 193.
Aquinas and quantifier mistakes.Anders John - 2012 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 71 (2):137-143.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
389 (#54,403)

6 months
70 (#80,879)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rem B. Edwards
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references