Composition and the cosmological argument

Mind 77 (305):115-117 (1968)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article argues that not all arguments from parts to wholes commit the informal logical fallacy of composition,and especially not the cosmological argument for God which moves from the contingent existence of all the parts of the cosmos to the contingent existence of the whole.

Similar books and articles

Van Inwagen on the Cosmological Argument.Anthony Brueckner - 2001 - Philosophical Papers 30 (1):31-40.
A new cosmological argument undone.Michael J. Almeida & Neal D. Judisch - 2002 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 51 (1):55-64.
The design argument.Elliott Sober - 2004 - In William Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 117–147.
Closed systems, explanations, and the cosmological argument.Kevin Davey & Mark Lippelmann - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 62 (2):89 - 101.
Edwards, Cox, and Cosmological Composition.Houston Craighead - 1976 - New Scholasticism 50 (1):122-124.
Composition and vagueness.Trenton Merricks - 2005 - Mind 114 (455):615-637.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
573 (#29,551)

6 months
79 (#52,887)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rem B. Edwards
University of Tennessee, Knoxville

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The fallacy of composition.William L. Rowe - 1962 - Mind 71 (281):87-92.

Add more references