Judging the 'weight of evidence' in systematic reviews:introducing rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing Signal and Noise

, , &
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):177-184 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00212.x

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 96,554

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems.Mary Dixon-Woods, Ray Fitzpatrick & Karen Roberts - 2001 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 7 (2):125-133.
Making a difference: towards a method for weighing the evidence in a qualitative synthesis.Hennie R. Boeije, Floryt van Wesel & Eva Alisic - 2011 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (4):657-663.
How to assess rigour . . . or not in qualitative papers.Joanna E. M. Sale - 2008 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):912-913.
Critical appraisal tools for assessing the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies included in systematic mixed studies reviews.Pierre Pluye - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):722-722.
A pragmatic strategy for the review of clinical evidence.Luciano Sagliocca, Salvatore De Masi, Luigina Ferrigno, Alfonso Mele & Giuseppe Traversa - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):689-696.
Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence‐based medicine age. [REVIEW]Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas, Regina Stella Spagnuolo, Amélia Kamegasawa, Leandro Gobbo Braz, Adriana Polachini do Valle, Eliane Chaves Jorge, Hugo Hyung Bok Yoo, Antônio José Maria Cataneo, Ione Corrêa, Fernanda Bono Fukushima, Paulo do Nascimento, Norma Sueli Pinheiro Módolo, Marise Silva Teixeira, Edison Iglesias de Oliveira Vidal, Solange Ramires Daher & Regina El Dib - 2013 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 19 (4):633-637.
Systematic reviews to support evidence‐based psychiatry: what about schizophrenia?Massimo Morlino, Antonio Calento, Gennaro Pannone, Gianluca Ventrella & Vittorio Schiavone - 2009 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 15 (6):1025-1028.
The role of qualitative research in broadening the 'evidence base' for clinical practice.Rosaline S. Barbour Ma - 2000 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):155-163.
Systematic reviews showed insufficient evidence for clinical practice in 2004: what about in 2011? The next appeal for the evidence‐based medicine age. [REVIEW]Villas Boas, Paulo José Fortes, Regina Stella Spagnuolo, Amélia Kamegasawa, Leandro Gobbo Braz, Adriana Polachini do Valle, Eliane Chaves Jorge, Hugo Hyung Bok Yoo, Antônio José Maria Cataneo & Ione Corrêa - forthcoming - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-24

Downloads
25 (#739,386)

6 months
7 (#978,649)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references