Is Law Coercive?

Legal Theory 1 (1):81-111 (1995)

Abstract

That law is coercive is something we all more or less take for granted. It is an assumption so rooted in our ways of thinking that it is taken as a given of social reality, an uncontroversial datum. Because it is so regarded, it is infrequently stated, and when it is, it is stated without any hint of possible complications or qualifications. I will call this the “prereflective view,” and I want to examine it with the care it deserves

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
82 (#145,087)

6 months
1 (#386,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

William A. Edmundson
Georgia State University

References found in this work

Are There Any Natural Rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
Toward a Theory of Coercion.Michael Corr - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):383 - 405.
Coercive Proposals [Rawls and Gandhi].Vinit Haksar - 1976 - Political Theory 4 (1):65-79.
Threats and Coercion.Martin Gunderson - 1979 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (2):247 - 259.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

Describing Law.Raff Donelson - 2020 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 33 (1):85-106.
The Enforcement Approach to Coercion.Scott A. Anderson - 2010 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 5 (1):1-31.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations