Describing Law

Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 33 (1):85-106 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Legal philosophers make a number of bold, contentious claims about the nature of law. For instance, some claim that law necessarily involves coercion, while others disagree. Some claim that all law enjoys presumptive moral validity, while others disagree. We can see these claims in at least three, mutually exclusive ways: (1) We can see them as descriptions of law’s nature (descriptivism), (2) we can see them as expressing non-descriptive attitudes of the legal philosophers in question (expressivism), or (3) we can see them as practical claims about how we should view law or order our society (pragmatism). This paper argues that we should understand these claims in the pragmatist way, as claims about how we should view law or order society.

Similar books and articles

Archimedean metaethics defended.Kenneth M. Ehrenberg - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):508-529.
Attitudinal Expressivism and Logical Pragmatism.Matthew Chrisman - 2014 - In Graham Hubbs & Douglas Lind (eds.), Pragmatism, Law, and Language. pp. 117-135.
Moderate Epistemic Expressivism.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (2):337-357.
From Global Expressivism to Global Pragmatism.John Capps - 2018 - Metaphilosophy 49 (1-2):71-89.
Pragmatist Critiques of Jurisprudence.Steven Meredith Garmon - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Virginia
Ethical Expressivism.James Sias - 2014 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Dworkin on the Semantics of Legal and Political Concepts.Dennis M. Patterson - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (3):545-557.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-03-02

Downloads
101 (#124,211)

6 months
19 (#57,126)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Raff Donelson
Illinois Institute of Technology