Bridging computational, formal and psycholinguistic approaches to language

Abstract

We compare our model of unsupervised learning of linguistic structures, ADIOS [1, 2, 3], to some recent work in computational linguistics and in grammar theory. Our approach resembles the Construction Grammar in its general philosophy (e.g., in its reliance on structural generalizations rather than on syntax projected by the lexicon, as in the current generative theories), and the Tree Adjoining Grammar in its computational characteristics (e.g., in its apparent affinity with Mildly Context Sensitive Languages). The representations learned by our algorithm are truly emergent from the (unannotated) corpus data, whereas those found in published works on cognitive and construction grammars and on TAGs are hand-tailored. Thus, our results complement and extend both the computational and the more linguistically oriented research into language acquisition. We conclude by suggesting how empirical and formal study of language can be best integrated.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,480

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Positional Value and Linguistic Recursion.John Kadvany - 2007 - Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (5-6):487-520.
Complexity in Language Acquisition.Alexander Clark & Shalom Lappin - 2013 - Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):89-110.
A Grammar Systems Approach to Natural Language Grammar.M. Dolores Jiménez López - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (4):419 - 454.
Lexicalized Non-Local MCTAG with Dominance Links is NP-Complete.Lucas Champollion - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (3):343-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-12-22

Downloads
50 (#232,639)

6 months
1 (#417,474)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?