Does Fidelity to Revolutionary Truths Undo Itself?

Radical Philosophy Review 22 (1):59-84 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article examines Alain Badiou’s and Slavoj Žižek’s advocacy for fidelity to revolutionary truths in light of complex system theory’s understanding of resiliency. It begins with a discussion of how Badiou and Žižek describe truth. Next, it looks at the features that make a complex system resilient. The article argues that if we understand neoliberalism as a resilient system, then the fidelity to revolutionary truths that Badiou and Žižek advocate is not enough, for it doesn’t realize how truths come from the system as a whole. The article concludes by describing how this viewpoint alters discussions of political change.

Similar books and articles

Some Notes (with Badiou and Žižek) on Event/Truth/Subject/Militant Community in Jean-Paul Sartre's Political Thought.Erik M. Vogt - 2015 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 17 (2):19-38.
Unveiling the religious motives in radical social critique.Boyan Znepolski - 2017 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 43 (4-5):474-483.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-02

Downloads
347 (#7,035)

6 months
130 (#138,823)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Eckstrand
Sam Houston State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references