Response to the critique by Dr. K. Brad Wray, published in foundations of chemistry October 6, 2022

Foundations of Chemistry 25 (3):457-461 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dr. K. Wray (2022) questioned my suggestion that T. W. Richards should be included as one of the scientists who contributed to the discovery of isotopes. This article provides additional support for inclusion of Richards as a contributor to the discovery.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s10698-023-09473-y

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,783

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Response to ``telltale signs: What common explanatory strategies in chemistry reveal about explanation itself''.Stephen J. Weininger - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 6 (1):45-48.
A case for the engagement between the sciences and the humanities. Jay A. Labinger’s: Connecting Literature and Science. New York: Routledge, 2022. [REVIEW]Jeffrey I. Seeman - 2022 - Foundations of Chemistry 24 (3):363-373.
The ontological autonomy of the chemical world: A response to Needham. [REVIEW]Olimpia Lombardi & Martín Labarca - 2006 - Foundations of Chemistry 8 (1):81-92.
The emergence of the philosophy of chemistry.Lee McIntyre - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):57-63.
Response.Eric Scerri - 2000 - Foundations of Chemistry 2 (1):77-78.
International society for the philosophy of chemistry: summer symposium 2011 in Latin America.[author unknown] - 2011 - Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1):9-9.
The closure of the Department of Chemistry at the University of Exeter – An insider’s view.Claus Jacob - 2006 - Foundations of Chemistry 9 (1):57-64.
Nalini Bhushan and Stuart Rosenfeld, eds: Of minds and molecules: New philosophical perspectives on chemistry. [REVIEW]Mary Jo Nye - 2002 - Foundations of Chemistry 4 (1):73-77.
A. lundgren and B. bensaude-Vincent, eds: Communicating chemistry: Textbooks and their audiences, 1789–1929. [REVIEW]Harry E. Pence - 2002 - Foundations of Chemistry 4 (1):79-81.
The instrumental revolution in chemistry.Habil Klaus Hentschel - 2003 - Foundations of Chemistry 5 (2):179-183.
The lame and the blind, or how much physics does chemistry need?Nikos Psarros - 2001 - Foundations of Chemistry 3 (3):241-249.
Book Review:Mark Albert: Galen’s Lectures: A Novel About Chemistry, Xlibris Corporation, 2000, 493 pp. [REVIEW]Harry E. Pence - 2005 - Foundations of Chemistry 7 (3):321-324.
Theoretical chemistry.Roald Hoffmann - 2004 - Foundations of Chemistry 6 (1):11-.
A critique of Atkins' periodic kindom and some writings on electronic structure.Eric R. Scerri - 1999 - Foundations of Chemistry 1 (3):295-303.
D.m. Knight and H. Kragh (eds.): The making of the chemist: The social history of chemistry in europe, 1789–1914. [REVIEW]Jack Morrel - 2000 - Foundations of Chemistry 2 (2):181-185.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-05-20

Downloads
10 (#1,191,137)

6 months
8 (#356,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Theodore Richards and the discovery of isotopes.K. Brad Wray - 2022 - Foundations of Chemistry 25 (1):57-66.
Whom should we credit for the discovery of isotopes?Gareth R. Eaton - 2019 - Foundations of Chemistry 22 (1):87-98.
Whom should we credit for the discovery of isotopes?Gareth R. Eaton - 2019 - Foundations of Chemistry 22 (1):87-98.
Whom should we credit for the discovery of isotopes?Gareth R. Eaton - 2019 - Foundations of Chemistry 22 (1):87-98.

Add more references